The Problem with “Monetizing”

I hear this word “monetize” a lot in social media. It’s usually close to the word “Twitter,” as in, “Twitter is looking for ways to monetize.” Pretty much every Web 2.0 bauble — from Facebook to Tumblr — is looking for ways to monetize.

I have problems with this word. For starters, who isn’t trying to monetize? Hell, I’m trying to monetize. Twitter looking for ways to monetize is like McDonald’s trying to monetize. The difference is McDonald’s wasn’t dumb enough to give their hamburgers away for free in the first place.

And that’s the crux of my beef — the meat of my argument, if you will. Shouldn’t “How will we make money?” be the first question you ask when you start a company, not an afterthought? ”Monetizing” is just code for “we didn’t plan ahead,” in my book.

Caesar didn’t look out over Rome’s vast republic and say, “Gee, we should do an IPO or something.” Napoleon didn’t think about revenues after conquering all of Europe. And just imagine the conversation if Columbus didn’t have a revenue plan when he went Queen Elizabeth:

Chris: Good news, Your Majesty. We’ve reached the New World and it’s awesome. Corn, cotton, gold — the whole enchilada.

Queen: That’s great, Chris. We should monetize. Any ideas?

Chris: Hmmm… Well, we could weave cotton into t-shirts, distribute them to the natives, then sell advertising space on the shirts.

Queen: Brilliant! Let me run it by our investors and see if they’ll finance a cotton gin.

Chris: The cotton gin hasn’t been invented yet, my lady.

Queen: Rats! Somebody call Scoble. Maybe he’ll have answers.

Imperialism works because there’s no “we’ll figure out the money later.” You don’t monetize your project. The money is the project.

I love what Wikipedia says about “monetization.” The Wik calls it “a buzzword for adapting non-revenue-generating assets to generate revenue.” Translation: “We’ll never convince you to pay for this, so how do we get someone else to pay for it?”

Plenty of people have figured out how to monetize. Chris Brogan and Joseph Jaffe both monetized this week, along with other prominent bloggers. While their method of monetization sparked quite a kerfuffle, you gotta give ‘em credit for cashing in on their success.

Kmart apparently has money to spend. Twitter needs money. And for a small fee, I could tell them how to structure a partnership.

What? I told you I was trying to monetize.


Did you enjoy this post? Why not leave a comment or subscribe to my feed and get articles like this delivered automatically each day to your feed reader.

  • When people began blogging I doubt they ever considered they'd be able to make money doing it. Now bloggers have huge audiences, but as their readership grows so do expectations and their workloads. Id' rather my favorite bloggers do sponsored posts or advertise than stop blogging. But that's just me.

    In the end, the audience will decide what works and what doesn't.
  • Nick Footer
    I agree that that has been a hot word recently. I wrote a small post about it today that encompassed a few other ideas too. One point was that social media has to keep itself free to it's users. That is one of the main drivers of web 2.0, user created free content. I understand that companies can't pay their employees with free content so they have to get it somewhere. You can't lay that cost on your users so advertising of some sort has to be done eventually to grow. Unfortunately, that can put off some users. I know I finally gave my MySpace because it was so much flash and no bang. Facebook and Twitter for life!!!
  • I've chosen to go the charity route, which I guess puts me in a similar, yet different place. Either way, I'm strongly of the opinion that this presents a win-win-win:
    1) Bloggers win - why shouldn't they benefit from all the free IP they've given out and time they've invested
    2) Community wins - by paying it forward...
    3) Brand wins - self evident, BUT think about this: compare the entire spend against a page or spread in People magazine?

    PS No trees were harmed in the typing of this comment
  • Hard not to like the idea of bloggers cashing in on all their free content creation!

    I've always thought the key to striking it rich was amassing an audience. In that sense, Twitter's in good shape. J.K. Rowling of Harry Potter fame isn't that great of a writer, and Michael Jordan ain't rich because he can dunk a basketball. Getting people to pay attention to you -- in large numbers -- is what attracts the dollars.
  • Aprill Jones
    Thanks, Scott. I've felt for years that the enormous volume of "writing" and "writers" available at the touch of a keyboard was devaluing what experienced advertising and marketing writers do. Waiting for the correction has been an exercise in creating new ways to find how to get paid for, to monetize, what we do. Maybe with the new buzz word, those ways will emerge more strongly and it will once again become a trend to pay good money for good writing. I say "Go! Go! Go! Chris and Joseph!
blog comments powered by Disqus