<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Twitter Really as Conversational as We Think It Is?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/18/is-twitter-really-as-conversational-as-we-think-it-is/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/18/is-twitter-really-as-conversational-as-we-think-it-is/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 12:57:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: aulia_m</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/18/is-twitter-really-as-conversational-as-we-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>aulia_m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=946#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>Whether Twitter is conversational or it&#039;s not It all depends on the circle of people you&#039;re in. In my stream, conversations happen almost every time and at times it&#039;s almost like a chat room. Other times, when this chatty group is not so active, it can be a stream of unidirectional information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you said, your research is unscientific and it is based solely on your circle. I follow close to 600 people and I can tell you conversation is alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether Twitter is conversational or it&#39;s not It all depends on the circle of people you&#39;re in. In my stream, conversations happen almost every time and at times it&#39;s almost like a chat room. Other times, when this chatty group is not so active, it can be a stream of unidirectional information.</p>
<p>As you said, your research is unscientific and it is based solely on your circle. I follow close to 600 people and I can tell you conversation is alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aulia_m</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/18/is-twitter-really-as-conversational-as-we-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-862</link>
		<dc:creator>aulia_m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 03:55:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=946#comment-862</guid>
		<description>Whether Twitter is conversational or it&#039;s not It all depends on the circle of people you&#039;re in. In my stream, conversations happen almost every time and at times it&#039;s almost like a chat room. Other times, when this chatty group is not so active, it can be a stream of unidirectional information.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As you said, your research is unscientific and it is based solely on your circle. I follow close to 600 people and I can tell you conversation is alive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether Twitter is conversational or it&#39;s not It all depends on the circle of people you&#39;re in. In my stream, conversations happen almost every time and at times it&#39;s almost like a chat room. Other times, when this chatty group is not so active, it can be a stream of unidirectional information.</p>
<p>As you said, your research is unscientific and it is based solely on your circle. I follow close to 600 people and I can tell you conversation is alive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Brown</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/18/is-twitter-really-as-conversational-as-we-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-769</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 17:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=946#comment-769</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s All My Children? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s All My Children? <img src='http://mediaemerging.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hepburn</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/18/is-twitter-really-as-conversational-as-we-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hepburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=946#comment-766</guid>
		<description>Okay, you get a pass. But if I find out your uncle is actually your father&lt;br&gt;and that you have a twin brother you never knew about, we&#039;re gonna have&lt;br&gt;trouble.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, you get a pass. But if I find out your uncle is actually your father<br />and that you have a twin brother you never knew about, we&#39;re gonna have<br />trouble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Chamberlin</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/18/is-twitter-really-as-conversational-as-we-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Chamberlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:42:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=946#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Well, true confession: my mother was on AMC all through the 80s. She played Pat Baxter, mother of Angie of &quot;Jessie and Angie&quot; fame. There! I&#039;ve said it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, true confession: my mother was on AMC all through the 80s. She played Pat Baxter, mother of Angie of &#8220;Jessie and Angie&#8221; fame. There! I&#39;ve said it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hepburn</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/18/is-twitter-really-as-conversational-as-we-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-764</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hepburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=946#comment-764</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m gonna pretend you didn&#039;t just demonstrate your encyclopedic knowledge&lt;br&gt;of &quot;All My &lt;br&gt;Children&quot;...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;;)&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Original Message:&lt;br&gt;-----------------</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m gonna pretend you didn&#39;t just demonstrate your encyclopedic knowledge<br />of &#8220;All My <br />Children&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p> <img src='http://mediaemerging.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Original Message:<br />&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew Chamberlin</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/18/is-twitter-really-as-conversational-as-we-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-763</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Chamberlin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:25:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=946#comment-763</guid>
		<description>I agree with your unscientific survey. What gets me about Twitter, which was on particularly egregious display during SxSW, is how it gets used as a giant IM tool. Largely, though, it seems like your stats bear out what I see on Twitter. I really don&#039;t see too many &quot;Oh, man, what an awesome sandwich I just ate&quot; tweets. But I do question it&#039;s conversational value, mostly because Twitter lacks context and is virtually impossible to follow. If only it were like &quot;All My Children&quot; which you could stop watching for 20 years and jump back in and see Erica Kane and Adam Chandler right back at it again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with your unscientific survey. What gets me about Twitter, which was on particularly egregious display during SxSW, is how it gets used as a giant IM tool. Largely, though, it seems like your stats bear out what I see on Twitter. I really don&#39;t see too many &#8220;Oh, man, what an awesome sandwich I just ate&#8221; tweets. But I do question it&#39;s conversational value, mostly because Twitter lacks context and is virtually impossible to follow. If only it were like &#8220;All My Children&#8221; which you could stop watching for 20 years and jump back in and see Erica Kane and Adam Chandler right back at it again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DrewGneiser</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/18/is-twitter-really-as-conversational-as-we-think-it-is/comment-page-1/#comment-762</link>
		<dc:creator>DrewGneiser</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=946#comment-762</guid>
		<description>I work with two Twitter accounts.  On our company&#039;s account (@axiompr) during the day, when I take a quick scan of the stream, it does seem to me that most of the Tweets begin with @. If that is how we would measure conversation on Twitter, then it would seem like things are pretty back and forth.  On my personal account, I am following less people, and it seems like there are fewer @ tweets in the stream.  What do these things show? Maybe that I am not following the right people on my personal account. Or maybe that conversations might spark on Twitter, but continue on a blog or a DM.  I believe that Twitter is conversational, but in my opinion, its what you make of it. Many just broadcast themselves and make no real effort to converse, but that does not diminish the people who are actually using it to connect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with two Twitter accounts.  On our company&#39;s account (@axiompr) during the day, when I take a quick scan of the stream, it does seem to me that most of the Tweets begin with @. If that is how we would measure conversation on Twitter, then it would seem like things are pretty back and forth.  On my personal account, I am following less people, and it seems like there are fewer @ tweets in the stream.  What do these things show? Maybe that I am not following the right people on my personal account. Or maybe that conversations might spark on Twitter, but continue on a blog or a DM.  I believe that Twitter is conversational, but in my opinion, its what you make of it. Many just broadcast themselves and make no real effort to converse, but that does not diminish the people who are actually using it to connect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
