<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Transparency vs. Responsibility? Err on the Side of Caution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 18:40:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 25 Big Questions for the Future of Journalism and PR &#124; Media Emerging</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-2352</link>
		<dc:creator>25 Big Questions for the Future of Journalism and PR &#124; Media Emerging</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 02:41:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=991#comment-2352</guid>
		<description>[...] Should bloggers adhere to journalistic standards when they publish information, even if they&#8217;re not trained journalists? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Should bloggers adhere to journalistic standards when they publish information, even if they&#8217;re not trained journalists? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pascucci</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-706</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pascucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=991#comment-706</guid>
		<description>Quoting the above post:&lt;br&gt;&quot;The real fault lies with Mzinga -- confronted with the fact that multiple independent sources had been telling a critical industry analyst that there was a problem, they elected NOT to immediately brief him on the situation. That is an enormous mistake and actually points to Jeremiah&#039;s information being accurate.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would love to be able to disagree with you more on the above, but I can not. I believe that Mzinga respected their employees enough to not go public with the information until the entire staff was informed. No one had any right to inform Jeremiah and no one had any right to  report on it until it was actual news, and until the information was shared with the employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting the above post:<br />&#8220;The real fault lies with Mzinga &#8212; confronted with the fact that multiple independent sources had been telling a critical industry analyst that there was a problem, they elected NOT to immediately brief him on the situation. That is an enormous mistake and actually points to Jeremiah&#39;s information being accurate.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would love to be able to disagree with you more on the above, but I can not. I believe that Mzinga respected their employees enough to not go public with the information until the entire staff was informed. No one had any right to inform Jeremiah and no one had any right to  report on it until it was actual news, and until the information was shared with the employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pascucci</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pascucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=991#comment-1399</guid>
		<description>Quoting the above post:&lt;br&gt;&quot;The real fault lies with Mzinga -- confronted with the fact that multiple independent sources had been telling a critical industry analyst that there was a problem, they elected NOT to immediately brief him on the situation. That is an enormous mistake and actually points to Jeremiah&#039;s information being accurate.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would love to be able to disagree with you more on the above, but I can not. I believe that Mzinga respected their employees enough to not go public with the information until the entire staff was informed. No one had any right to inform Jeremiah and no one had any right to  report on it until it was actual news, and until the information was shared with the employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting the above post:<br />&#8220;The real fault lies with Mzinga &#8212; confronted with the fact that multiple independent sources had been telling a critical industry analyst that there was a problem, they elected NOT to immediately brief him on the situation. That is an enormous mistake and actually points to Jeremiah&#39;s information being accurate.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would love to be able to disagree with you more on the above, but I can not. I believe that Mzinga respected their employees enough to not go public with the information until the entire staff was informed. No one had any right to inform Jeremiah and no one had any right to  report on it until it was actual news, and until the information was shared with the employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pascucci</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pascucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=991#comment-707</guid>
		<description>Very interesting to see both sides of the coin here. I was involved in the situation - as I was a Mzinga employee who was one of the unlucky ones. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeremiah is a very talented individual and no doubt is well-respected in the field. My opinion of him has not changed and I continue to become a more well-informed individual because of his sharing of information. He has realized what could have been done differently and (as mentioned in his post below) is planning to learn from the experience.  This was bound to happen and I hope that we can all learn from this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting to see both sides of the coin here. I was involved in the situation &#8211; as I was a Mzinga employee who was one of the unlucky ones. </p>
<p>Jeremiah is a very talented individual and no doubt is well-respected in the field. My opinion of him has not changed and I continue to become a more well-informed individual because of his sharing of information. He has realized what could have been done differently and (as mentioned in his post below) is planning to learn from the experience.  This was bound to happen and I hope that we can all learn from this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pascucci</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pascucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 20:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=991#comment-1397</guid>
		<description>Very interesting to see both sides of the coin here. I was involved in the situation - as I was a Mzinga employee who was one of the unlucky ones. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeremiah is a very talented individual and no doubt is well-respected in the field. My opinion of him has not changed and I continue to become a more well-informed individual because of his sharing of information. He has realized what could have been done differently and (as mentioned in his post below) is planning to learn from the experience.  This was bound to happen and I hope that we can all learn from this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting to see both sides of the coin here. I was involved in the situation &#8211; as I was a Mzinga employee who was one of the unlucky ones. </p>
<p>Jeremiah is a very talented individual and no doubt is well-respected in the field. My opinion of him has not changed and I continue to become a more well-informed individual because of his sharing of information. He has realized what could have been done differently and (as mentioned in his post below) is planning to learn from the experience.  This was bound to happen and I hope that we can all learn from this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pascucci</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pascucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=991#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Quoting the above post:&lt;br&gt;&quot;The real fault lies with Mzinga -- confronted with the fact that multiple independent sources had been telling a critical industry analyst that there was a problem, they elected NOT to immediately brief him on the situation. That is an enormous mistake and actually points to Jeremiah&#039;s information being accurate.&quot;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I would love to be able to disagree with you more on the above, but I can not. I believe that Mzinga respected their employees enough to not go public with the information until the entire staff was informed. No one had any right to inform Jeremiah and no one had any right to  report on it until it was actual news, and until the information was shared with the employees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quoting the above post:<br />&#8220;The real fault lies with Mzinga &#8212; confronted with the fact that multiple independent sources had been telling a critical industry analyst that there was a problem, they elected NOT to immediately brief him on the situation. That is an enormous mistake and actually points to Jeremiah&#39;s information being accurate.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would love to be able to disagree with you more on the above, but I can not. I believe that Mzinga respected their employees enough to not go public with the information until the entire staff was informed. No one had any right to inform Jeremiah and no one had any right to  report on it until it was actual news, and until the information was shared with the employees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Pascucci</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Pascucci</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2009 13:49:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=991#comment-704</guid>
		<description>Very interesting to see both sides of the coin here. I was involved in the situation - as I was a Mzinga employee who was one of the unlucky ones. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jeremiah is a very talented individual and no doubt is well-respected in the field. My opinion of him has not changed and I continue to become a more well-informed individual because of his sharing of information. He has realized what could have been done differently and (as mentioned in his post below) is planning to learn from the experience.  This was bound to happen and I hope that we can all learn from this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting to see both sides of the coin here. I was involved in the situation &#8211; as I was a Mzinga employee who was one of the unlucky ones. </p>
<p>Jeremiah is a very talented individual and no doubt is well-respected in the field. My opinion of him has not changed and I continue to become a more well-informed individual because of his sharing of information. He has realized what could have been done differently and (as mentioned in his post below) is planning to learn from the experience.  This was bound to happen and I hope that we can all learn from this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tshelton</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-1398</link>
		<dc:creator>tshelton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=991#comment-1398</guid>
		<description>Will it change your opinion if it turns out next week that Mzinga is declaring bankruptcy?  If the person reporting incomplete information turns out to be correct, do we then applaud them for helping all of us be ahead of the curve?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The real fault lies with Mzinga -- confronted with the fact that multiple independent sources had been telling a critical industry analyst that there was a problem, they elected NOT to immediately brief him on the situation.  That is an enormous mistake and actually points to Jeremiah&#039;s information being accurate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your comparison to battlefield information is at best an ad hominem -- there is no way in which the class of problem of Mzinga having financial difficulties should be compared with the men and women of our armed forces putting their lives at risk.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A better comparison would be the collapse of aig or bear stearns or lehman (or enron!) -- would it have been responsible for an analyst to blow the whistle on those companies before their collapse and say to their clients and constituents - &quot;hey, I think something fishy is going on here!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Will it change your opinion if it turns out next week that Mzinga is declaring bankruptcy?  If the person reporting incomplete information turns out to be correct, do we then applaud them for helping all of us be ahead of the curve?</p>
<p>The real fault lies with Mzinga &#8212; confronted with the fact that multiple independent sources had been telling a critical industry analyst that there was a problem, they elected NOT to immediately brief him on the situation.  That is an enormous mistake and actually points to Jeremiah&#39;s information being accurate.</p>
<p>Your comparison to battlefield information is at best an ad hominem &#8212; there is no way in which the class of problem of Mzinga having financial difficulties should be compared with the men and women of our armed forces putting their lives at risk.</p>
<p>A better comparison would be the collapse of aig or bear stearns or lehman (or enron!) &#8212; would it have been responsible for an analyst to blow the whistle on those companies before their collapse and say to their clients and constituents &#8211; &#8220;hey, I think something fishy is going on here!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Hepburn</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-1403</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Hepburn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 17:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=991#comment-1403</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for stopping by to engage, Jeremiah. Your willingness to do so -- even on a tough topic like this -- is why I (and many others) respect you, and is symbolic of social media working at its best.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&quot;What I do next is what matters&quot; -- a great takeaway lesson for anyone reading. Social media is chock full of people and companies who parachute in, use the medium to deliver THEIR message, and then airlift out. Those individuals and companies who commit to the medium (practice? way of thinking?) and maintain a long-term, come-what-may presence will have the most success.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thanks again...hope we get to cross philosophical swords in person someday ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for stopping by to engage, Jeremiah. Your willingness to do so &#8212; even on a tough topic like this &#8212; is why I (and many others) respect you, and is symbolic of social media working at its best.</p>
<p>&#8220;What I do next is what matters&#8221; &#8212; a great takeaway lesson for anyone reading. Social media is chock full of people and companies who parachute in, use the medium to deliver THEIR message, and then airlift out. Those individuals and companies who commit to the medium (practice? way of thinking?) and maintain a long-term, come-what-may presence will have the most success.</p>
<p>Thanks again&#8230;hope we get to cross philosophical swords in person someday ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Owyang</title>
		<link>http://mediaemerging.com/2009/03/31/transparency-vs-responsibility-err-on-the-side-of-caution/comment-page-1/#comment-1402</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Owyang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mediaemerging.com/?p=991#comment-1402</guid>
		<description>Thank you all for the level-headed commentary here.  I messed up my approach, and I recognized that and have apologized in public for it.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Thank you for recognizing my intent, and why I felt I was obligated to do.  Going back, I certainly would have done things very different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What I do next is what matters.  I&#039;ve learned, will apply these lessons to what I do going forward, and hope that you&#039;ll see that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It&#039;s nice to see some civil discussion on this, now let&#039;s move forward.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you all for the level-headed commentary here.  I messed up my approach, and I recognized that and have apologized in public for it.  </p>
<p>Thank you for recognizing my intent, and why I felt I was obligated to do.  Going back, I certainly would have done things very different.</p>
<p>What I do next is what matters.  I&#39;ve learned, will apply these lessons to what I do going forward, and hope that you&#39;ll see that.</p>
<p>It&#39;s nice to see some civil discussion on this, now let&#39;s move forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
